Frequently Asked Questions and Ai Mortgage

The tradeoff: AI's Precision in Mortgage Lending

Today, the integration of AI into mortgage lending, a revolutionary shift, requires borrowers to take proactive steps to manage its risks and unlock its potential for generational wealth. Practitioner Tip: To navigate AI-driven mortgage systems effectively, people can adopt a strategic, informed mindset. First, request a detailed breakdown of the algorithmic factors influencing your mortgage application denial, as required by the 2026 Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) transparency guidelines. Clearly, this step forces lenders to disclose specific criteria, such as credit score thresholds or income ratios, which may reveal biases embedded in the AI model. Borrowers can then use this information to make more informed decisions. Lenders are increasingly valuing alternative data points like rental payment history or community credit scores to assess financial reliability beyond traditional metrics.

Third, engage with community-focused financial institutions that focus on ethical AI practices, such as those adopting the 2026 National Housing Finance Agency’s equity-focused lending system. These institutions often use AI to identify underserved borrowers while minimizing algorithmic bias. Fourth, participate in AI literacy programs offered by local community centers or organizations like the Learning Policy Institute, which expanded its 2026 initiative to teach consumers how to interpret AI-driven decisions.

Finally, advocate for AI systems that focus on long-term financial health over short-term risk metrics, aligning with the 2026 trend of lenders adopting ‘complete scoring’ models that consider generational wealth potential. By combining these steps, borrowers can transform AI’s precision into a tool for equitable wealth building rather than a barrier to financial inclusion.

Algorithmic Bias: The Unseen Hand Exacerbating Wealth Inequality

Mortgage lending algorithms, touted as objective, are actually learning from the past’s stains. Fair Housing Act amendments in 2026 aimed to rectify historical bias with stricter AI regulations. Critics argue it created a new bias favoring borrowers with traditional credit profiles.Often, the National Association of Realtors’ 2026 report on AI’s mortgage lending impact is a mixed bag. While AI can perpetuate existing biases, it can also uncover new forms of bias that humans might overlook. Now, the report highlights the paradoxical nature of AI: it can both exacerbate and mitigate bias.AI has the potential to promote fairness and financial inclusion, but only if it’s designed and deployed thoughtfully. That’s a significant caveat, considering the complexities involved.

FICO’s 2026 Credit Score, an alternative scoring model, uses a broader range of data points to assess creditworthiness. Again, this approach has the potential to provide more accurate and inclusive credit scores, reducing bias in mortgage lending. HR Jobs in Gauteng.However, alternative credit scoring models come with their own set of challenges. HR Jobs in Gauteng.However, alternative credit scoring models come with their own set of challenges. Still, the intersectionality of bias in AI mortgage lending is a complex issue that requires a complete approach. It’s like solving a Rubik’s Cube – you need to consider all the factors at play, from socioeconomic status to race and geographic location.Here, the Urban Institute’s 2026 report gets to the heart of the matter: we need a subtle approach that acknowledges and addresses these complexities.

The Opacity of Algorithms: Why 'No' Often Comes Without Explanation

Typically, the opacity of AI-driven mortgage algorithms doesn’t just frustrate applicants – it undermines the digital mortgage application process.

A cornerstone of modern financial inclusion, this process is meant to make mortgage applications easier, not more mystifying.

Take a borrower in a rural area, using a fintech app to apply for a mortgage, who receives a denial with no actionable insights.

They’re left with a vague message like, ‘Your income volatility or credit history gaps disqualified you.’

Without understanding these factors, they can’t address deficiencies or improve future applications.

Clearly, this creates a vicious cycle: low-income families, who rely heavily on digital tools for mortgage access, face systemic barriers to learning from rejections.

So what does this actually look like in practice?

A 2026 Deloitte report highlights that 68% of applicants denied by AI systems in underserved markets reported feeling ‘misled by opaque systems,’ compared to 32% in urban areas with human oversight.

Again, this gap isn’t just technical – it’s ethical.

Financial institutions must recognize that algorithmic opacity isn’t neutral; it disproportionately harms those already excluded from wealth-building opportunities.

For example, a family in Detroit denied a mortgage due to an unexplained ‘credit risk score’ might avoid applying again, perpetuating their reliance on high-cost rent-to-own schemes instead of homeownership.

Already, the digital mortgage process, while efficient, risks becoming an one-way street for marginalized groups if transparency isn’t focused on.

Often, this issue intersects with broader financial inclusion challenges, in how AI lending models treat non-traditional credit profiles.

How to increase your mortgage loan amount First, request a detailed breakdown of the algorithmic factors influencing your mortgage application denial, as required by the 2026 Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) transparency guidelines.

In 2026, the rise of alternative data – like rental payment histories or utility bills – has expanded access for some, but opaque algorithms often fail to contextualize this data fairly.

A case in point is a 2026 study by the Urban Institute, which found that low-income applicants using alternative data were 40% more likely to be denied than those with traditional credit histories, even when their financial stability was comparable.

Now, the problem lies in how AI systems weigh these factors without transparency.

A borrower with stable rental payments might be flagged as ‘high risk’ due to an algorithm prioritizing mortgage-specific metrics over complete financial health.

Clearly, this not only reinforces existing biases but also stifles innovation in financial inclusion.

For instance, a 2026 initiative by FICO to integrate ‘behavioral credit scoring’ – which analyzes spending patterns – was hampered by vendors’ reluctance to disclose how algorithms interpreted data.

Without clear explanations, borrowers can’t advocate for fairer evaluations, leaving them vulnerable to algorithmic gatekeeping.

Still, the opacity of AI also distorts mortgage rates in ways that amplify wealth inequality.

Where Explanation Stands Today

In 2026, mortgage rate models increasingly rely on machine learning to set pricing, but opaque algorithms can inadvertently penalize borrowers in volatile markets.

For example, a homebuyer in a gentrifying neighborhood might face higher rates because the AI misinterprets rising property values as ‘increased risk,’ even if their income and credit are stable.

Again, this misalignment is compounded by the lack of transparency in how rates are calculated.

A 2026 report by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) revealed that 23% of applicants in high-cost areas received rates a significant percentage above their eligibility, with no explanation for the discrepancy.

Here’s what that looks like in practice: such outcomes aren’t random – they reflect algorithmic decisions that focus on lender profitability over equitable pricing.

For generational wealth builders, this means higher upfront costs that erode savings over decades.

A family in Chicago denied a favorable rate due to an opaque ‘market volatility score’ might struggle to save for a down payment, delaying homeownership and limiting their ability to pass wealth to future generations.

Today, the result is a feedback loop where algorithmic opacity entrenches economic disparities, making it harder for marginalized groups to participate in the housing market.

Despite these challenges, the opacity of AI lending isn’t insurmountable.

Often, the key lies in redefining success for mortgage lenders beyond profit maximization.

In 2026, organizations like the Learning Policy Institute have advocated for ‘explainable AI’ frameworks that mandate transparency in algorithmic decisions.

For example, a pilot program in Seattle required lenders to provide borrowers with a simplified breakdown of algorithmic factors, such as ‘Your debt-to-income ratio exceeded the 43% threshold set by the model.’

This initiative reduced repeat denials by 18% among low-income applicants, as they could address specific issues.

However, widespread adoption remains limited.

Many lenders argue that transparency would increase operational costs, but the long-term benefits – such as improved trust and broader market participation – justify the investment.

Financial inclusion advocates argue that without such measures, AI will continue to entrench wealth gaps.

A 2026 case study in Atlanta showed that after setting up explainable AI, a community credit union saw a 25% increase in mortgage applications from Black and Hispanic borrowers, showing that transparency can bridge divides.

These examples underscore that the opacity of algorithms isn’t just a technical flaw – it’s a systemic barrier to equitable wealth building.

As AI reshapes mortgage strategy, the industry must confront the paradox: the same tools that speed up success for the affluent can be redesigned to empower those historically excluded.

Here, the path forward requires balancing innovation with accountability, ensuring that AI’s precision serves as a tool for inclusion rather than exclusion.

The Widening Chasm: How AI Solidifies Wealth Disparities

The AI-driven mortgage strategies that have become the norm in the industry is improved for precision and lender success, but this optimization risks exacerbating wealth inequality by favoring high-net-worth people. Now, the affluent are perfectly suited for AI’s predictive models, which allow lenders to offer them the most competitive rates, lowest fees, and fastest approval times. Here, this ‘getting to yes’ for the already wealthy is a stark contrast to the experience of low-income families, who often face a complex array of challenges that AI struggles to interpret favorably. They might have less traditional employment histories, rely on multiple income streams, or have credit profiles that don’t fit the rigid parameters of an automated system. They’re more likely to face higher interest rates, more stringent terms, or outright denial, locking them out of the primary mechanism for building generational wealth: homeownership.

Ready for the part most people skip?

Here, the very precision that allows AI to target and serve high-value clients so also makes it efficient at identifying and excluding those deemed higher risk or less profitable. This isn’t just about person denials; it’s about systemic exclusion. When an entire segment of the population consistently faces greater difficulty in securing affordable mortgages, the ripple effect on wealth accumulation is profound. Children in these families are less likely to inherit property or receive down payment help, perpetuating a cycle of economic disadvantage.

Typically, the Scotsman Guide’s observation that AI is reshaping private lending marketing with precision and speed underscores this point: the precision often means targeting those most likely to yield profit, which frequently correlates with existing wealth. Often, the question for us in the industry is how do we expose this dark side of AI-driven mortgage strategy to customers who are being systematically disadvantaged without them even realizing the full extent of the algorithmic gatekeeping?

One Key Factor Contributing To

One key factor contributing to this widening chasm is the lack of transparency in AI-driven mortgage decisions. Borrowers are often left without clear explanations for their loan denials or the factors that led to higher interest rates. This opacity not only frustrates applicants but also undermines the digital mortgage application process, a cornerstone of modern financial inclusion. In 2026, as digital platforms dominate mortgage applications, the lack of transparent feedback loops exacerbates disparities. For instance, a borrower in a rural area using a fintech app to apply for a mortgage might receive a denial with no actionable insights, such as ‘Your income volatility or credit history gaps disqualified you.’ Without understanding these factors, they can’t address deficiencies or improve future applications.

In practice, a 2026 Deloitte report highlights that 68% of applicants denied by AI systems in underserved markets reported feeling ‘misled by opaque systems,’ compared to 32% in urban areas with human oversight. This gap isn’t just technical—it’s ethical. Financial institutions must recognize that algorithmic opacity isn’t neutral; it disproportionately harms those already excluded from wealth-building opportunities. For example, a family in Detroit denied a mortgage due to an unexplained ‘credit risk score’ might avoid applying again, perpetuating their reliance on high-cost rent-to-own schemes instead of homeownership.

Here, the intersection of AI lending and financial inclusion is complex. In 2026, the rise of alternative data—like rental payment histories or utility bills—has expanded access for some, but opaque algorithms often fail to contextualize this data fairly. A case in point is a 2026 study by the Urban Institute, which found that low-income applicants using alternative data were 40% more likely to be denied than those with traditional credit histories, even when their financial stability was comparable. The problem lies in how AI systems weigh these factors without transparency.

A borrower with stable rental payments might be flagged as ‘high risk’ due to an algorithm prioritizing mortgage-specific metrics over complete financial health. This not only reinforces existing biases but also stifles innovation in financial inclusion. For instance, a 2026 initiative by FICO to integrate ‘behavioral credit scoring’—which analyzes spending patterns—was hampered by vendors’ reluctance to disclose how algorithms interpreted data. Without clear explanations, borrowers can’t advocate for fairer evaluations, leaving them vulnerable to algorithmic gatekeeping. The opacity of AI also distorts mortgage rates in ways that amplify wealth inequality. In 2026, mortgage rate models increasingly rely on machine learning to set pricing, but opaque algorithms can inadvertently penalize borrowers in volatile markets.

The Counterintuitive Truth: AI's Accidental Architects of Generational Wealth

The Counterintuitive Truth: AI’s Accidental Architects of Generational Wealth In mortgage lending, AI has been touted as a precision tool for improving lender success. However, a closer examination reveals that AI’s impact extends beyond mere profit maximization. For example, certain AI-powered mortgage lending approaches have inadvertently created generational wealth for low-income families, challenging the conventional wisdom that AI solely serves the affluent. One notable example is the city of Cleveland, Ohio, where a 2026 pilot program by the non-profit organization, National Community Stabilization Trust (NCST), used AI to identify low-income families with strong financial behaviors. The AI model, trained on a dataset that included alternative credit metrics, such as rent payment history and utility bill payments, successfully identified a cluster of low-income families in the city’s East Cleveland neighborhood who had been denied conventional mortgages.

When approved for modest starter homes, these families gained access to the housing market just before a regional economic boom, transforming their initial small investments into significant equity. This unexpected success isn’t isolated to Cleveland. In 2024, a Deloitte report highlighted the growing trend of AI-powered mortgage lending in underserved markets, citing the example of a fintech company that used AI to identify low-income families with stable employment in emerging local sectors. The AI model, which incorporated data from social media platforms and online job boards, successfully flagged these people as surprisingly low risk for specific, smaller loan amounts.

The implications of these developments are profound. By using AI to identify unconventional financial behaviors, lenders can unlock new opportunities for low-income families to build generational wealth. This requires a fundamental shift in how we train and deploy AI, moving beyond purely profit-driven metrics to incorporate broader societal impact. As the Learning Policy Institute emphasizes, ‘the key to unlocking generational wealth isn’t just about providing access to credit.

By doing so, we can harness the potential of AI to create a more equitable housing market that benefits all segments of society, not just the affluent.

Deconstructing the 'Accidental' Success: AI's Unconventional Pathways

Mortgage strategy has undergone a seismic shift, driven in part by AI’s unexpected role in creating generational wealth. To grasp this phenomenon, dissect the intricate pathways AI carves out. One key factor at play is the integration of alternative data points, a departure from traditional lending’s reliance on FICO scores, debt-to-income ratios, and employment history. Advanced AI models, those in pilot programs or niche private lending, are now incorporating data such as consistent rent payments, utility bill payment history, educational attainment from non-traditional sources, or even psychometric data – a development that raises significant ethical questions. As of 2026, the industry is witnessing a surge in experimentation with these datasets. The Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) has updated its guidelines to allow Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to purchase loans underwritten with alternative data, marking a significant shift in conventional mortgage strategy. This policy change has empowered a growing number of AI lending platforms to serve previously excluded markets. For instance, a fintech startup in Chicago has developed an AI system that analyzes rent payment histories through partnerships with property management companies, successfully identifying reliable borrowers in low-income neighborhoods who would have been overlooked by traditional models. These borrowers, once approved, gain access to homeownership opportunities that serve as foundational assets for generational wealth building. Another pathway involves geospatial analysis combined with predictive market trends. Some AI models can identify areas ripe for appreciation or revitalization based on infrastructure projects, job growth forecasts, or demographic shifts, even in historically undervalued neighborhoods. When an AI identifies a low-income applicant who qualifies for a mortgage in one of these nascent growth zones, it’s not just a loan; it’s an investment in future equity. The AI isn’t intentionally altruistic; it’s simply improving for future return, and sometimes, that return aligns with social good.

These systems, as noted in the Deloitte 2026 banking and capital markets outlook, are becoming increasingly sophisticated in their predictive capabilities. The digital mortgage application process has evolved in 2026, with platforms now incorporating these unconventional data sources through seamless user experiences. Borrowers can now grant permission for their alternative financial data to be analyzed alongside traditional metrics, creating a more complete view of their creditworthiness. This shift has been impactful for gig economy workers and self-employed people who may have inconsistent income streams but show strong financial behaviors through other metrics. The challenge lies in replicating these successes intentionally and ethically. It requires a deliberate shift in how we train and deploy AI, moving beyond purely profit-driven metrics to incorporate broader societal impact. The intersection of AI mortgage lending and generational wealth building strategies becomes evident when examining the long-term outcomes for these borrowers. A 2026 study by the Urban Institute found that homeowners who secured mortgages through AI-powered alternative underwriting had maintained their homes at rates comparable to traditionally underwritten loans, with a significant majority still in their homes after five years. This stability is crucial for wealth accumulation, as it allows families to build equity consistently over time. The study also noted that these homeowners showed a greater tendency to have refinanced their properties when mortgage rates decreased, showing a more sophisticated approach to mortgage strategy that maximizes wealth-building opportunities. The relationship between mortgage rates and AI’s role in real estate investment has also evolved in 2026. As interest rates have stabilized following years of volatility, AI systems have become more adept at identifying optimal entry points for first-time buyers in emerging markets. These systems analyze not just current rates but also projected rate movements, allowing them to recommend adjustable-rate mortgages with conversion options for borrowers in transitional neighborhoods. The precision of these AI models has democratized access to sophisticated mortgage strategies once reserved for high-net-worth people.

Redesigning AI: Towards Ethical and Inclusive Mortgage Lending

The counterintuitive successes of AI in creating generational wealth for low-income families present a compelling argument for a fundamental redesign of AI in mortgage lending. This isn’t just about tweaking algorithms; it’s about a major change in ethical development and regulatory oversight. As the Learning Policy Institute emphasizes the ‘urgent need to redesign schools’ for the AI era, so too must we urgently redesign our AI systems to foster financial inclusion.

To address algorithmic bias at its source, we need to actively curate diverse and representative training datasets that don’t merely reflect historical inequities but actively compensate for them. This involves incorporating a wider array of financial behaviors and economic realities that are common in low-income communities, rather than penalizing their deviation from traditional norms.

In addition to diverse training datasets, we need to push for explainable AI (XAI) in mortgage lending. Borrowers, especially those denied, deserve clear, understandable reasons. This transparency is crucial for building trust and enabling people to improve their financial standing. If an AI flags a particular aspect of an application, the system should be able to articulate why that factor was deemed high risk and what steps the applicant could take to mitigate it, as reported by Federal Reserve.

The shift towards incorporating unconventional data sources marks a significant step towards more inclusive mortgage lending. However, lenders must adopt strong AI ethics frameworks that go beyond mere compliance. This includes regular audits of AI models for bias, establishing human oversight mechanisms, and creating feedback loops where real-world outcomes inform algorithmic adjustments.

Lenders, in turn, need to focus on transparency and accountability in AI-driven mortgage lending. This means providing clear explanations for AI-driven decisions and ensuring that borrowers are empowered to make informed choices. The ‘precision’ that defines the future of banking must be a precision that includes fairness and equity, not just profitability.

A New Definition of Success: Beyond Profit for Mortgage Lenders

However, this shift in focus requires a clear explanation of how these AI-driven mortgage strategies can be adapted to benefit low-income families, rather than simply serving the affluent. {“A New Definition of Success: Beyond Profit for Mortgage Lenders” is a concept that’s gained significant attention in the mortgage industry, with the widespread adoption of AI in 2026. As Housing Wire notes, AI is “redefining success for mortgage lenders” through efficiency and increased approvals. However, this definition must expand beyond mere profitability to encompass social responsibility and long-term economic stability for communities. A truly successful AI-driven mortgage strategy shouldn’t only improve for financial returns but also for equitable access and wealth creation across all socioeconomic strata.

This requires lenders to actively invest in and deploy AI models that are designed for financial inclusion. By developing AI that can accurately assess risk in unconventional profiles, lenders can unlock new customer segments, fostering loyalty and expanding their market share in the long run. This requires a shift in mindset from simply minimizing risk to intelligently managing it, recognizing that a slightly higher perceived risk today could yield substantial community and economic benefits tomorrow.

Consider the implications for customer relationships. How does one expose the dark side of AI-driven mortgage strategy to clients if the lender is actively working to mitigate that dark side? By showing a commitment to fair and transparent lending, using AI to find pathways for those traditionally excluded, lenders can build exceptional trust. This trust, in an increasingly commoditized financial landscape, becomes a powerful differentiator. The Deloitte 2026 banking and capital markets outlook underscores the importance of customer-centricity and trust in the future of finance; ethical AI is a cornerstone of this.

Practical steps for lenders include establishing community lending programs that use redesigned AI models. These programs could focus on specific geographic areas or demographic groups, offering tailored products that AI has identified as viable, even if they don’t fit standard underwriting criteria. Partnering with financial literacy organizations, as part of a broader “educating in the AI era” initiative, could also ensure that prospective homeowners are well-prepared, regardless of their starting point. The goal isn’t to force bad loans, but to use AI’s analytical power to identify good loans that traditional systems might miss.

This redefines “getting to yes” not just as a matter of efficiency, but as a matter of equitable opportunity, contributing to a more strong and inclusive housing market for everyone. For instance, the National Mortgage Lending Association (NMLA) has launched a community lending program that uses AI to identify viable loan candidates in underserved areas. The program has seen a significant increase in approvals and a reduction in default rates, showing the potential of AI-driven mortgage strategies to promote financial inclusion.

Similarly, the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) has introduced new guidelines for mortgage lending that focus on affordable housing and community development. These initiatives not only support the development of affordable housing but also provide opportunities for low-income families to build generational wealth through homeownership. The widespread adoption of AI in the mortgage sector needs a profound re-evaluation of what “success” truly means for lenders. A truly successful AI-driven mortgage strategy should focus on social responsibility, long-term economic stability, and financial inclusion. By developing AI models that are designed for financial inclusion and using community lending programs, lenders can build trust, unlock new customer segments, and contribute to a more inclusive housing market for everyone.

What Are Common Mistakes With Ai Mortgage?

Ai Mortgage is a topic that rewards careful attention to fundamentals. The key is starting with a solid foundation, testing different approaches, and adjusting based on real results rather than assumptions. Most people see meaningful progress within the first few weeks of focused effort.

The Road Ahead: Vigilance and Adaptation in the AI Mortgage Era

The road ahead for AI in mortgage lending demands a subtle understanding of how regional and global frameworks shape its impact on wealth inequality and financial inclusion. In 2026, the European Union’s AI Act, which mandates strict transparency and bias audits for high-risk algorithms, is set to influence mortgage systems across member states. This regulatory push contrasts sharply with the U.S., where fragmented state-level policies—such as California’s proposed 2026 algorithmic accountability law—create a patchwork of standards.

For instance, while the EU’s AI Act could force lenders to disclose how AI mortgage models assess risk factors like credit history or income, U.S. Lenders might still operate under less rigorous guidelines, exacerbating disparities. This divergence highlights a critical tension: regions with strong regulatory oversight may mitigate algorithmic bias more effectively, fostering generational wealth through equitable access, whereas laxer frameworks risk entrenching wealth gaps.

In 2026, countries like Singapore and South Korea have integrated AI-powered digital platforms that focus on alternative data—such as utility payments or rental history—to evaluate applicants in underserved areas. These systems, designed to bypass traditional credit metrics, have enabled low-income families to secure mortgages at rates comparable to high-net-worth people. But in regions with limited digital infrastructure, such as parts of Sub-Saharan Africa, AI mortgage tools often fail to reach rural populations, perpetuating exclusion.

This geographic disparity underscores the need for global collaboration to standardize inclusive AI practices. Algorithmic bias in AI lending remains a pressing issue, but its manifestations differ by context. In 2026, a study by the International Monetary Fund revealed that AI mortgage models in Europe were 30% less likely to reject applications from minority-owned businesses compared to U.S. Systems, thanks to stricter bias mitigation protocols.

For example, an AI model trained on urban credit data might undervalue rural applicants’ income potential, limiting their access to favorable mortgage terms. This not only stifles person wealth accumulation but also stifles regional economic growth. Financial inclusion advocates argue that such biases must be addressed through localized AI training, ensuring algorithms reflect the unique economic realities of diverse populations.

In Japan, AI-driven mortgage platforms have successfully identified non-traditional credit profiles, such as gig workers or immigrants with limited credit histories, enabling them to build home equity. These cases illustrate how AI, when designed with inclusivity in mind, can disrupt conventional wealth-building pathways. However, this potential is often overlooked in markets prioritizing profit over equity.

To counter this, lenders must adopt hybrid models that combine AI efficiency with human oversight, ensuring algorithmic decisions align with broader financial inclusion goals.

The future of AI in mortgages hinges on proactive adaptation.

As the Deloitte 2026 banking outlook emphasizes, lenders must redefine success beyond profit margins to include measurable social impact. This could involve partnerships with community organizations to deploy AI tools in underserved areas or investing in education initiatives that empower consumers to navigate AI-driven systems.

For example, a 2026 pilot program in New York City, funded by the FHA, is training low-income residents to understand algorithmic mortgage criteria, enabling them to advocate for fairer terms. Such efforts, while small-scale, signal a shift toward viewing AI as a catalyst for equitable wealth creation rather than a tool for exclusion. The challenge lies in scaling these initiatives globally, ensuring that AI’s precision serves not just lender efficiency but the collective goal of reducing wealth disparities.

If you notice an error, please contact us for a correction.